Editorials

Editorial: E-cig policy makes no sense

By The CNM Chronicle Editorial Board

 Banning of the use of electric cigarettes in common areas and classrooms on campus is not right. In the article “Electronic ciga­rettes may be formally banned from indoor use on campus” on page 10, Director of Marketing and Communications Brad Moore said that the school has always con­sidered electronic cigarettes to be the same as cigarettes, but often, these devices are used by students, staff and faculty in an effort to quit smoking.

It is true that the FDA is still research­ing the effects of electronic cigarettes on a person’s health, but many people have quit or cut down on regular cigarettes because of the e-cig.

If there were compelling evidence that e-cigarettes caused health concerns through the second-hand vapor, the ban would be understandable, but so far the FDA has only acknowledged possible health risks to the individual using the device.

Further, the policy, modeled after the Dee Johnson Clean Air Act, states that it bans products that use nicotine, but liquids for electronic cigarettes are available with­out nicotine, just flavor.

Another flaw is that students who leave in the middle of class, shoes with lights on them and people with brightly colored hair are also a distraction.

None of these things are banned.

A better policy on campus would be to allow faculty members to decide what is best for their classroom until a time comes when there is conclusive evidence that elec­tronic cigarettes are a hazard to non-users in the area.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s